., Finnis 2000a, 2000b.)
Consider the following list from Yablo (2000a):
The entry relies at many places on Szabó, 2000a.
Wooldridge 2000a deals with logical formalizations of rational agents.
., Yablo 2000a, Szabó 2001, Hofweber 2000, and Thomasson 2013 for discussion of this type of argument.
(Barth 1961, 1,2: 342; for a discussion on Barth’s comparative comments, see Hirota 2000a, especially pp. 35–38)
Granted that trivialism is absurd (though see Priest 2000a, Priest 2006, Ch. 3, and Kabay 2010), dialetheism must be rejected.
As with the relation between God and extramundane space, Oresme identifies eternity with God himself (Kirschner 2000a, 178–179).
“A relevance shift,” he argues with typical restraint, “is a sure-fire way of knocking out all the paradoxes of confirmation” (2000a, 232.).
Rivers develops a similar view, arguing that our moral faculty enables us to “recognize and respond” to the objective property of harmony (Rivers 2000a: 143; see also 126).
For instance, one might think that recognizing that the environment is part of our cultural heritage can ground distinctive reasons or obligations to preserve it (Thompson 2000a).
Notably, since the “memory free” argument is restricted to a special sort of case, it does not show that EXT and SK are entirely incompatible (Goldberg 1999a, p. 217; Goldberg 2000a).
He authorized only two interviews (Goodman 1980, 2005), did not write an autobiography, and rejected the invitation to be honored with a volume in the prestigious Schilpp Library of Living Philosophers (Elgin 2000a, 2).
Lewis’s dissatisfaction with his own attempts to deal with the problem of late preemption, as well as his theory’s inability to deal with ‘trumping preemption’ (Schaffer 2000a), led to the development of his 2000 theory.
Such passages have led other commentators to conclude that correct aesthetic taste for Shaftesbury requires well-cultivated reflective, discursive abilities (Rivers 2000a: 126–9; Darwall 1995: 186; Townsend 1982: 210–12).
Most of the political writers of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries were involved in controversy about the extent and limits (or absence of limits) of papal authority (Miethke 2000a; Oakley 2012: 173ff. and 2015: 14ff.).
She alleges that the ordinance approach relies on the law to enforce social norms and thus fails to struggle “beyond those symbolic forms that have been deeply inscribed in and by the structures of gender”, as new forms of erotica sometimes do (Cornell 2000a: 554).
Discussions of RCCP in the context of quantum theory include Butterfield (1989, 2007); Chang and Cartwright (1992) Kowalski and Placek (1999); Penrose and Percival (1962); Placek (2000a,b); van Fraassen (1982a, 1991); Wüthrich (2004); and Wiseman and Cavalcanti (2017).
But one may require more from the rejectivist, namely that every formula is logically equivalent to a formula in what Humberstone (2000a, Footnote 10) calls “Bendall normal form”, namely to a formula that contains at most one occurrence of the negation sign as the principal connective.
Humberstone (2000a, 368) challenges rejectivism, by asking the rejectivists to “show how the claim for the conceptual priority of rejection over negation is any more plausible than the corresponding claim for the conceptual priority of alterjection over disjunction—or indeed, ambi-assertion over conjunction,” where alterjection (ambi-assertion) is the supposedly primitive speech act the linguistic embodiment of which is disjunction (conjunction).
On this page, there are 20 sentence examples for 2000a. They are all from high-quality sources and constantly processed by lengusa's machine learning routines.
Just use the " " button to fragment sentence examples and start your learning flow.
Example output from one of your searches:
Humberstone 2000a 368 challenges rejectivism by asking the rejectivists to show how the claim for the conceptual priority of rejection over negation is any more plausible than the corresponding claim for the conceptual priority of alterjection over disjunction—or indeed ambi-assertion over conjunction where alterjection ambi-assertion is the supposedly primitive speech act the linguistic embodiment of which is disjunction conjunction