Sentence examples for 2008a from high-quality English sources.

• For further discussion, see Dutilh Novaes 2008a: §3.8.

• Bächtold (2008a,b) takes an approach to quantum theory he calls pragmatist.

• ., O’Callaghan 2008a, and essays in Bullot and Egré 2010, including Matthen 2010, Nudds 2010).

• However, Paulo Jonas de Lima Piva (Brazil) (2007, 2008a,b) has done some work focusing especially on Diderot.

• HD-confirmation and Hempelian confirmation convey different intuitions (see Huber 2008a for an original analysis).

• Farkas (2008a,b), Pitt (2004) (though not in Pitt 2009), and Woodward (2016, forthcoming-a) defend a grounding version of PIT.

• Such parallels may warrant talk of object perception in a more general sense that is common to both vision and audition (O’Callaghan 2008a).

• Van Benthem (2003), Kooi (2003), Baltag and Smets (2008a), and van Benthem, Gerbrandy, and Kooi (2009b) studied logics of finite probability spaces.

Use 2008a in a sentence.

• As Kania (2008a, 22) and Cameron (2008, 295) put it in the context of discussions of the ontology of musical works, the triad may be specified as follows:

• Weissart (1997) and Parker (2008a) argued for various forms of analogy between these strategies and a number of strategies available to simulationists to sanction their results.

• In fact, Gendler suggests (2008a: 663) that aliefs are causally responsible for much of the “moment-by-moment management” of human behavior, whether that behavior is belief-concordant or not.

• Starting mainly in the 1980s, psychologists arrived at the Big Five taxonomy using two different paths (McCrae and John 1992: 181–187; Goldberg 1993: 30; for a review of earlier work, see John et al. 2008a).

• Furthermore, some constructivists account for their lack of interest in semantics with the conviction that the semantic task with which traditional metaethics is preoccupied is positively misguided (Korsgaard 1996a, 2003; Street 2008a: 239).

• Some proponents of phenomenal intentionality hold that it has a relational structure (Pautz 2010, 2013; Speaks 2015; Bourget forthcoming-a, forthcoming-c), while others (Farkas 2008a,b; Kriegel 2011a,b, 2013; Mendelovici 2018; Pitt 2009) deny this.

• Gendler (2008a, 2008b) claims that alief, which she proposes as an innate propensity to automatically respond to a real or apparent stimulus, is what is responsible for resistance reactions, not imagination (for more on alief, see section 3.3 of the entry on imagination).

• Farkas (2008a) agrees with Loar and Horgan et al. (2004) that PIT is the best available theory of narrow content but criticizes Loar (2003a) and Horgan et al. (2004) for making a concession to externalism by allowing for externally-determined reference, truth-conditions, or broad content.

2008a sentence examples

• There is much more to the Big Five approach than can be covered here, but let’s move on to its relevance to philosophical issues about character (for helpful reviews of the Big Five model, see McCrae and John 1992; Goldberg 1993; Piedmont 1998; McCrae and Costa 2003: chapters 2 and 3; John et al. 2008a).

• While acknowledging that his interpretation has an instrumentalist flavor, in his 2008a he distinguishes it from the instrumentalism of Peres (1995) and others, who all (allegedly) claim some metaphysical ideas but seek to remove the expression “microscopic system” from the vocabulary used by quantum physicists.

• This account has been criticized as vacuous because it fails to say what activities are (Psillos 2004), to account for the relationship of causal and explanatory relevance (Woodward 2002), and to mark an adequate distinction between activities and correlations (Psillos 2004), though see Bogen (2005, 2008a) for a response.

• Theorists have recently used ableism to interrogate what disability is, including cognitive disability (Carlson 2001), how ableism works together with and produces race (Campbell 2008a), the ableism of the concept of resilience (Hutcheon & Wolbring 2013), questions of epistemic responsibility (Reynolds 2016a), sexuality (Baril & Trevenen 2014), and a critical theory of harm (Reynolds 2016b).