For any particular e. m. f.
"I'm sorry, but f--- that.
That is, one has misidentified which thing is F.
Zegerman wanted to know in what nineteen-thirties comedy was everything “F this” and “F that.”
So now I'm like, f--- that.
The last time Lexus stuffed a naturally aspirated V8 into the IS compact sedan was 2007 in the IS F.
There is no judgment aggregation rule F that jointly satisfies the above conditions that is not a dictatorship.
This account assumes that if being F is predicable of a, there is a state of affairs a’s being F that ontologically depends on them.
By this is meant a function f that takes us from a pair ⟨p,q⟩ of sentences to a set f(⟨p,q⟩) of pairs of alternatives (perhaps possible worlds).
That is, there is a reading of “Jane believes that she is F” that does not imply self-consciousness on Jane’s part.
An arrow f ∶ A → B is called an isomorphism if there is an arrow g ∶ B → A inverse to f—that is, such that g ○ f = 1A and f ○ g = 1B.
The aim of D8 is to establish, for a variety of different properties F, that if the one is not, then the others are neither F nor con-F.
For the biology geeks on the podcast, V-E-G-F, that is a protein that we all have the instruction in our DNA, which basically tells your body to make a new blood vessel.
That is, an existential claim that there is an F that is G, plus a signal that this is given information, is often enough to allow us to implicate that there is unique F that is G.
So the second sentences of discourses of the form of (40) ought to have readings on which they mean the unique F that is G is H (Russellian) and on which they mean every F that is G is H (numberless).
To make this notion of adequacy more precise, we define a realization (sometimes called translation or interpretation) to be a function f that assigns to each propositional atom of modal logic a sentence of arithmetic, where
Further, as a result of the Success postulate, the incoming formula F that brings about the belief change is assumed to be completely trustworthy: the agent accepts without question the incoming information F and incorporates it into her set of beliefs as per the belief change process.
In order to solve it, we need to find a relation between the state of affairs a’s being F and a and being F that (i) does not make a and being F parts of the state of affairs, (ii) allows one to distinguish between necessarily co-obtaining states of affairs, and (iii) distinguishes the state of affairs a’s being F from other objects that, intuitively speaking, involve a and being F.
All three theses might seem contentious today. (1) seems to allude to Phaedo 100e’s notorious thesis about the role of the Form of F-ness in any x’s being F—that x is F “by the Form of F-ness.” (2) looks contentious because it implies (3); and (3) brings me to a second question about 142a–145e (which is also an important question about the whole dialogue): What is the meaning of the Greek word that I am translating as “knowledge,” epistêmê?
On this page, there are 20 sentence examples for F���that. They are all from high-quality sources and constantly processed by lengusa's machine learning routines.
Just use the " " button to fragment sentence examples and start your learning flow.
Example output from one of your searches:
All three theses might seem contentious today 1 seems to allude to Phaedo 100es notorious thesis about the role of the Form of F-ness in any xs being F—that x is F by the Form of F-ness 2 looks contentious because it implies 3 and 3 brings me to a second question about 142a–145e which is also an important question about the whole dialogue What is the meaning of the Greek word that I am translating as knowledge epistêmê