“Those were — interesting,” Feehan said.
According to Chisholm and Feehan, however, deception can be unintentional.
"If you think you know someone who is depressed, the best and simplest thing you can do, is to sit down and talk to them," says Feehan.
Dan Feehan, the Democrat, is a military veteran and former Defense Department official.
The Democratic candidate in 2018, Dan Feehan, narrowly lost after a scorching ad campaign.
Feehan is an Iraq War veteran but in an increasingly conservative portion of the state, which stretches across Minnesota’s southern border.
During a recent stop in Minnesota’s 1st Congressional District, where the Democratic nominee, Dan Feehan, had previously expressed support for Mr.
This is the breach of trust or breach of faith in lying: “Lying, unlike the other types of deception, is essentially a breach of faith” (Chisholm and Feehan 1977, 153).
For most objectors the assertion condition supplements L1 and makes L1 even narrower (Chisholm and Feehan 1977; Fried 1978; Simpson 1992; Williams 2002; Faulkner 2007).
A person may deceive another person by causing that person to continue to have a false belief (Fuller 1976, 21; Chisholm and Feehan 1977, 144; Mahon 2007 189–190; Carson 2010, 50; Shiffrin 2014, 19).
Watching a comedy show in a dimly lit club, where the spotlight is on the performer, allows the audience members more freedom to laugh at jokes others in the room may find insensitive or vulgar, Feehan said.
., as well as to what might be another person—for example, if a home owner, woken up in the middle of the night and wondering if there are burglars below the stairs, shouts down, “I’m bringing my rifle down there,” although he has no rifle (Chisholm and Feehan 1977, 157).
Chisholm and Feehan hold that the victim is not making an assertion, and hence, is not lying, given that the victim believes that the thief is not justified in believing that the victim is being truthful (Chisholm and Feehan 1977, 154–155; but see Strudler 2009 (cf.
For example, if a person begging for money says “All my children need medical attention,” but believes that this proposition is neither true nor false, because he has no children, then he is not lying, even if he is attempting to deceive (Chisholm and Feehan 1977, 155–6; but see Siegler 1966, 135).
Although some philosophers hold that deceiving may be inadvertent or mistaken (Demos 1960; Fuller 1976; Chisholm and Feehan 1977; Adler 1997; Gert 2005), many philosophers have argued that it is not possible to deceive inadvertently or mistakenly (Linsky 1970; van Horne 1981; Barnes 1997; Carson 2010; Saul 2012; Faulkner 2013).
A commonly accepted definition of making a statement is the following: “x states that p to y =df (1) x believes that there is an expression E and a language L such that one of the standard uses of E in L is that of expressing the proposition p; (2) x utters E with the intention of causing y to believe that he, x, intended to utter E in that standard use” (Chisholm and Feehan 1977, 150).
Against the intention to deceive the addressee condition of L1 it has been objected that, even if an intention to deceive the addressee is required for lying, it is not necessary that it be an intention to deceive the addressee about the content of the untruthful statement; it may be an intention to deceive the addressee about the beliefs of the speaker abut the statement—specifically, the belief that the untruthful statement is true (Chisholm and Feehan 1977, 152; Williams 2002, 74; Reboul 1994, 294; Mahon 2008, 220; Tollefsen 2014, 24).
Roderick Chisholm and Thomas Feehan hold that one is only making an assertion to another person if one makes a statement to another person and one believes that the conditions are such that the other person is justified in believing both that one believes one’s statement to be true and that one intends that the other person believe that one believes one’s statement to be true: “x asserts p to y =df x states p to y and does so under conditions which, he believes, justify y in believing that he, x, not only accepts p, but also intends to contribute causally to y’s believing that he, x, accepts p” (Chisholm and Feehan 1977, 152).
On this page, there are 18 sentence examples for Feehan. They are all from high-quality sources and constantly processed by lengusa's machine learning routines.
Just use the " " button to fragment sentence examples and start your learning flow.
Example output from one of your searches:
Roderick Chisholm and Thomas Feehan hold that one is only making an assertion to another person if one makes a statement to another person and one believes that the conditions are such that the other person is justified in believing both that one believes ones statement to be true and that one intends that the other person believe that one believes ones statement to be true x asserts p to y df x states p to y and does so under conditions which he believes justify y in believing that he x not only accepts p but also intends to contribute causally to ys believing that he x accepts p Chisholm and Feehan 1977 152