What about premise (2)?
This power is limited to accessing the warrant premise and does not allow for the search and seizure of things in that adjoining premise.”
Premise (3) is clearly true.
Reaction (d) implies the rejection of premise 2.
If one judges only by the explicit premise (“Dr.
Premise 2 is justified by the mode of hypothesis.
Does this mean that his use of premise 1 begs the question?
Call this premise, “the normative premise.”
The second premise is something we learn from modern physics.
Any argument that includes its conclusion as a premise will be valid.
But there are other theories that lead to the rejection of this premise as well.
Howell’s specific objection is that Kant does not establish the following crucial premise:
Some theorists distinguish between something they call “single premise” and something they call “multiple-premise closure”.
But in fact, Premise 1 of the skeptical argument itself may provide the best reason for doubting Premise 3 of that argument.
This leaves premise (2), the premise that, if atheism is very probably true, then atheistic belief is rationally permissible.
The premise containing the major term is the major premise, and the premise containing the minor term is the minor premise.
Rather we have reason to believe the conclusion, assuming the premise is true, provided that no other explanation better accounts for the truth of the premise.
Nevertheless, given that the argument that Draper offers in support of the premise at (6) involves a number of detailed considerations, very careful scrutiny of those arguments would be needed before one could conclude that the premise is justified.
Repetitive syllogisms consist of (i) a hypothetical premise (conditional or disjunctive) containing the conclusion or its negation as one of its parts, and (ii) another premise which asserts or denies (and thereby “repeats”) part of the hypothetical premise.
(2) Counterexamples to one of the premises that are not also counterexamples to the conclusion (“local but not global counterexamples”): These require us to improve the proof by replacing the refuted premise with a new premise which is not subject to the counterexample and which (we hope) will do as much to establish the conclusion as the original refuted premise did.
Premise
verb communication
- set forth beforehand, often as an explanation
Example: He premised these remarks so that his readers might understand
noun communication
- a statement that is assumed to be true and from which a conclusion can be drawn
verb communication
- furnish with a preface or introduction
verb cognition
- take something as preexisting and given
On this page, there are 20 sentence examples for Premise. They are all from high-quality sources and constantly processed by lengusa's machine learning routines.
Grid-Flow technology
Just use the " " button to fragment sentence examples and start your learning flow.
Example output from one of your searches:
2 Counterexamples to one of the premises that are not also counterexamples to the conclusion local but not global counterexamples These require us to improve the proof by replacing the refuted premise with a new premise which is not subject to the counterexample and which we hope will do as much to establish the conclusion as the original refuted premise did