Sentence examples for W from high-quality English sources.

• George W.

• Call it w′.

• W. 416 531 2123.

• : Booth, 222 W. 45th St. 212-239-6200.

• MIKE QUINN: Buia, 541 W. 23rd St. 212-366-9915.

• NAN GOLDIN: Marks, 523 W. 24th St. 212-243-0200.

• JAMIE ISENSTEIN: Kreps, 525 W. 22nd St. 212-741-8849.

• HENRY CLAY ANDERSON: Kasher, 521 W. 23rd St. 212-966-3978.

Use W in a sentence.

• HENRY CLAY ANDERSON: Kasher, 521 W. 23rd St. 212-966-3978.

• ROBERT GOBER: Marks, 526 W. 22nd St. and 521 W. 21st St. 212-243-0200.

• . | A)(w) on B given A, is proper at w, if P(. | A)(w) = 1, whenever w ∈ A ∈ A.

• And an n-place predicate R applies to haecceities e1,…,en at w just in case the relation expressed by R is coexemplified with e1,…,en at w.

• “If A, B” is true at w iff B is true at F(A, w), i.e. at w′, the world most similar to w at which A is true.

• Suppose Moe is sitting in the actual world w and standing in alternative world w′, while Curley is standing in w and sitting in w′.

• A false proposition may be made either worse or better by strengthening (~w is the same distance from the Truth as ~h; h&r&~w is better than ~w while ~h&~r&~w is worse).

• Since we are evaluating (6) with regard to the intended interpretation of its language, the w-extension of ‘P’ that is returned by its intension, for any world w, is the (perhaps empty) set of John's pets in w and that of ‘M’ is the set of mammals in w.

W sentence examples

• Ordinal measurability with interpersonal level comparability (OLC): Two profiles and <W*1, W*2, …, W*n> contain the same information whenever, for each i ∈ N, W*i = φ(Wi), where φ is the same positive monotonic transformation for all individuals.

• The major scale uses the sequence W–W–H–W–W–W–H, as shown in the first of the following examples, while the intervals in the minor scale are W–H–W–W–H–W–W, as in the second.

• Ordinal measurability with no interpersonal comparability (ONC): Two profiles and <W*1, W*2, …, W*n> contain the same information whenever, for each i ∈ N, W*i = φi(Wi), where φi is some positive monotonic transformation, possibly different for different individuals.

• As noted, a SWFL respects a given assumption about measurability and interpersonal comparability if, for any two profiles and <W*1, W*2, …, W*n> that are deemed to contain the same information, we have F(W1, W2, …, Wn) = F(W*1, W*2, …, W*n).