Sentence examples for k from high-quality English sources.

• K

• Is (K) true?

• Where would we be without the letter "K"?

• Light appears more yellow at 2,000 K and a bluish white at 6,000 K.

• Bile is necessary for the absorption of vitamin K.

• That is exactly what (K-0) says – so (K-0) must be true.

• Niiniluoto's min-sum-average) guarantees that K*A is closer to the truth than K.

• Thus any non-empty subset of K is more ‘believable’ than any set disjoint from K.

Use k in a sentence.

• It follows that the projective sets of (k-tuples of) reals are exactly P((ωω)k) ∩ L1(ℝ).

• Preferential semantics relies on a function S taking a set K of models into a subset S(K) of K.

• You become a fierce advocate for all things “K”: K-dramas, K-food, K-beauty products.

• Olympic events for women, contested over a distance of 500 metres, include K-1 (from 1948), K-2 (from 1960), and K-4 (from 1984).

• Other Klebsiella species include K. oxytoca and K. planticola, which along with K. pneumoniae can cause human urinary tract and wound infections.

• The explanatory store over K, E(K), is the best systematization of K (Kitcher here makes an idealization by claiming that E(K) is unique).

• If you contribute 10% of your $26,000 salary to a 401(k), you'd see a $100 difference in your check when contributing to a Roth 401(k) and an $88 difference contributing to a Traditional 401(k).

• For the deterministic interpretation, the discontinuous type-forming operations have an indexed form ↑k, ⊙k, ↓k explicitly referring to the k-th split point of their interpretants.

k sentence examples

• A BRM ⟨K, *⟩ is non-trivial if and only if there is K ∈ K and there are three sentences that are pairwise inconsistent and such that none of the negations of these sentences is in K.

• Δk(S-k) denotes the set of probability distributions over the measurable space (S-k, k), where k denotes the Boolean algebra generated by the strategy combinations S-k.

• Attributive better: For all kinds K, and things A and B, for A to be a better K than B is for the set of all of the right kind of reasons to choose A over B when selecting a K to be weightier than the set of all of the right kind of reasons to choose B over A when selecting a K.

• (The proof that Tarski seems to have in mind is this: suppose that X is a Tarskian logical consequence of K; then there is no model of K which is not a model of X; so there is no substitution instance <K′, X′> of <K, X> such that the sentences in K′ are true and X′ is false; for if there was one such, it would readily provide an interpretation—constituted by the extensions of the extra-logical constants of <K′, X′>—which would constitute a model of K that would not be a model of X.