What kinds of groups are these?
Three kinds of hair in the brush one love has left on the kitchen counter.
These kinds were embraced in the Parmenides (esp.
A distinct approach to artifact kinds is proposed by Thomas Reydon (2014).
Three kinds of sleep in the hum home down the dark valley back to New Haven.
Scientific disciplines frequently divide the particulars they study into kinds and theorize about those kinds.
Unlike most causal theories, this one is restricted in scope to just natural kinds and terms for natural kinds.
Most theorists agree that as there are different kinds of respect, so there are different kinds of self-respect.
Such theorists argue that social categories are “real kinds” in the world, much like water and gold are “natural kinds”.
The difference between natural kinds and social kinds is a difference of the degree of control we have over the object of classification.
He accepts that there are properties that natural kinds have in common, but denies that these are intrinsic properties of kinds (cf. criterion 1 above).
It is likely (though not necessary) that one’s decision about the kinds of explananda that fall under the range of the PSR will determine the kinds of things counted as explanantia.
Many of these are defined in terms of specific laboratory tasks and are unlikely to qualify as natural kinds (Tulving 2007), kinds that carve nature—in this case, the mind—at its joints.
The HPC view is offered as a third way between essentialism and nominalism about kinds in the special sciences (Boyd 1991, 1997, 1999; Kornblith 1993; Wilson 1999, 2005; see also the entry on natural kinds).
Ereshefsky and Reydon (2015) argue that there are several distinct kinds of scientific kinds, including non-causal kinds, functional kinds, and heterostatic kinds.
But those who believe that there are several different fundamental kinds of necessity need to address another question: What is the common feature of these fundamental kinds of necessity that makes them all kinds of necessity?
Plato and later Greek thinkers, as also many of ancient India, distinguished kinds of pleasure connected with craving kinds of desire from kinds of pleasure that involve no desire or need and hence none of the suffering, tension, or stress connected with these.
In a series of important papers (2003, 2007b, 2014), she points out that realists about kinds are not, in fact, forced to choose between showing that artifact kinds can be understood on the mind-independent model of natural kinds, or denying that artifact kinds are real.
Rather than assimilating artifact kinds to natural kinds by showing that artifacts are actually mind-independent in some way, as Elder and others have tried to do, the epistemological turn suggests that since natural kinds were never mind-independent to begin with, there is in principle no barrier to a unified account of artifact and natural kinds.
committed to two kinds of entities (the natural and the supernatural), two kinds of external relations (the natural and the supernatural), two kinds of causation (the natural and the supernatural), two kinds of non-topic-neutral properties (the natural and the supernatural), and so on, whereas naturalism is committed to only one kind in each of these categories. (2013: 52)
On this page, there are 20 sentence examples for kinds. They are all from high-quality sources and constantly processed by lengusa's machine learning routines.
Just use the " " button to fragment sentence examples and start your learning flow.
Example output from one of your searches:
committed to two kinds of entities the natural and the supernatural two kinds of external relations the natural and the supernatural two kinds of causation the natural and the supernatural two kinds of non-topic-neutral properties the natural and the supernatural and so on whereas naturalism is committed to only one kind in each of these categories 2013 52