Sentence examples for priori from high-quality English sources.

• But what is a synthetic a priori judgment?

• It is rare, however, to find a philosopher who accepts a priori concepts but denies a priori propositions.

• So much of the discussion will focus on a priori justification.

• Do such examples show that mathematics is not an a priori science?

• Many philosophers think we can know some moral propositions a priori.

• A priori knowledge is, in an important sense, independent of experience.

• Thus Kaplan concludes that she can know a priori the proposition that she exists.

• Justification and knowledge that is not a priori is called “a posteriori” or “empirical”.

Use priori in a sentence.

• According to Burge, a priori knowledge does not depend for its justification on any sensory experience.

• Specific versions of this view of a priori knowledge will depend on specific versions of a priori justification.

• (I know a priori that something exists because I know a priori that I exist and know this entails ‘Something exists’.)

• The historical a priori points at conditions whose dominion is as inexorable, there and then, as Kant’s synthetic a priori.

• Others go farther, claiming that most or all moral claims can be known a priori, or even that moral claims can be known only a priori.

• In this entry, we clarify the concept of a priori knowledge (and related concepts), as well as the relationship between a priori knowledge and analyticity.

• If a priori justification is independent of all empirical experience, then no such experience can count either for or against a proposition that is justified a priori.

• While the term “a priori” is sometimes used in this way, the strict use of the term restricts a priori justification to justification derived solely from the use of reason.

priori sentence examples

• It would be interesting devote more specific attention to a priori meta-ethical epistemology, but we are concerned mostly with a priori knowledge or justification of moral propositions.

• Given that knowledge is distinct from justification, and is also a stronger relation than justification, do a posteriori necessities pose a problem for a priori justification about modal truths or only for a priori knowledge?

• But it is a biologized a priori: what is a priori to an individual organism was a posteriori to its ancestors; not only does the a priori pre-form experience, but the a priori is itself formed from experience.

• In summary, it seems that accounts of a priori justification that do not hold that it rests on evidence provided by a nonexperiential source are in danger of counting certain beliefs or acceptances as a priori justified that, intuitively, do not seem to be.