It is demonstrated by a use of the quoting sentence.
A sentence that includes both a main and a subordinate clause is known as a complex sentence.
For example, a 10-year jail sentence may be commuted to 5 years, or a sentence of death may be commuted to life in prison.
That’s a lot of pressure on the first sentence, which is why my novels always begin with the sentence “Oh, no, something went wrong at the book printers,’ and the first sentence of this book was erased—ah, well, here comes the rest of the novel, I guess.”
On its use as a fictional sentence it is allegedly equivalent to:
One way to think of a proposition is as the meaning of a sentence.
Consider the sentence: ‘This sentence is not true’.
A composite modal sentence corresponds to a de dicto modal sentence.
The first sentence is sometimes known as the topic sentence because it features the main topic or point of the paragraph.
Notice that conditional probability functions apply only to pairs of sentences, a conclusion sentence and a premise sentence.
A sentence is semantically de re just in case it permits substitution of co-designating terms without changing the truth-value of the sentence.
So, for example, analysis in the first-order idiom would reveal that (1) is a depth-1 sentence; (2) is a depth-2 sentence; and (3) is a depth-3 sentence.
It would declare any sentence whatsoever as meaningful: For any sentence A and any observation sentence O, A would be meaningful because it could be conjoined to A ⊃ O.
In the manner of a revenge paradox, if our Liar sentence had originally said ‘this sentence does not express a true proposition’, then we would have our Liar sentence back.
A positive sentence is one that can be constructed out of &, ∨and any true basic sentence (where a basic sentence is either an atomic sentence or its negation).
Sentence bargains also occur in less-serious cases, such as pleading guilty to a charge in exchange for a sentence of “time served,” which generally means that the defendant will be immediately released.
The problem is that it seems that any theory which implies at least one T-sentence for every sentence of the language will also imply more than one T-sentence for every sentence in the language.
Rather, we want a semantic theory to entail, for each sentence of the object language, exactly one interpretive T-sentence: a T-sentence such that the sentence used on its right-hand side gives the meaning of the sentence mentioned on its left-hand side.
Understood along these lines, metaphorical truth would be something like the revelatory power conferred upon a metaphorical sentence (or on the impulse to use such a sentence) by a successful metaphorical interpretation of the sentence, a successful ascription to it of metaphorical meaning.
In this second use, the functor (operator, connective) “It is a fact that” takes a sentence to make a sentence (an alternative view has it that “It is a fact” takes a nominalised sentence, a that-clause, to make a sentence), and the predicate “is a fact” is either elliptic for the functor, or takes a nominalised sentence to make a sentence.
- pronounce a sentence on (somebody) in a court of law
- a string of words satisfying the grammatical rules of a language
Example: he always spoke in grammatical sentences
- (criminal law) a final judgment of guilty in a criminal case and the punishment that is imposed
- the period of time a prisoner is imprisoned
On this page, there are 20 sentence examples for sentence. They are all from high-quality sources and constantly processed by lengusa's machine learning routines.
Just use the " " button to fragment sentence examples and start your learning flow.
Example output from one of your searches:
In this second use the functor operator connective It is a fact that takes a sentence to make a sentence an alternative view has it that It is a fact takes a nominalised sentence a that-clause to make a sentence and the predicate is a fact is either elliptic for the functor or takes a nominalised sentence to make a sentence