. § 1505; United States v.
Unconscious occurrent states could be such states.
…part, with relations between the states and privileges of the citizens of the states.
Small states (or more accurately, small nation-states) include modern city states, free ports, principalities and island states (Malta, the Channel Islands, Iceland and so on).
According to type-identity theory, mental states are brain states.
So, it seems that wide intentional states are not phenomenal intentional states.
Thus, there are not enough computational states for the physical states to map onto.
(For the history of the United States see the separate United States history article.)
One or two smaller states could always go first, with the specific states rotating each cycle.
What they disagree on is whether the potentially conscious or dispositional states count as intentional states.
The name Warring States is derived from an ancient work known as the Zhanguoce (“Intrigues of the Warring States”).
Alternatively, one might make a distinction between states with a stronger and states with a weaker intentionality.
The war started after 11 Southern states separated themselves from the United States and formed their own government.
Versions of (Moderate or Strong) PIT that identify phenomenal intentional states with phenomenal states can also be nonreductive.
Some intentional states are constituted by phenomenal states, and the rest are in some way importantly related to phenomenal states.
The pundits like to slice-and-dice our country into Red States and Blue States; Red States for Republicans, Blue States for Democrats.
On grounding views, phenomenal intentional states are grounded in phenomenal states (either in individual states or in sets of such states).
One view is that non-phenomenal intentional states are simply dispositions to have phenomenal intentional states and that these dispositions get their contents from the phenomenal intentional states that they are dispositions to bring about (Searle 1983, 1990, 1991, 1992).
It is a rare circumstance in the United States, a country where travel between states is generally welcomed and often only noticed in counts of tourism visits, that states are suddenly looking for ways to discourage residents of other states from coming into theirs.
Mearsheimer based his theory on five core assumptions: (1) the international system is anarchic (there is no authority that exists above the states to arbitrate their conflicts), (2) all states have some military capability (however limited), (3) states can never fully ascertain the intentions of other states, (4) states value survival above all else, and (5) states are rational actors that seek to promote their own interests.
On this page, there are 20 sentence examples for states. They are all from high-quality sources and constantly processed by lengusa's machine learning routines.
Just use the " " button to fragment sentence examples and start your learning flow.
Example output from one of your searches:
Mearsheimer based his theory on five core assumptions 1 the international system is anarchic there is no authority that exists above the states to arbitrate their conflicts 2 all states have some military capability however limited 3 states can never fully ascertain the intentions of other states 4 states value survival above all else and 5 states are rational actors that seek to promote their own interests